Volvo V90 2016 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V90 and Volkswagen Passat have the same engine power, but Volvo V90 torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo V90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo V90 is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1526 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V90 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Passat is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |