Volvo V90 2016 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V90 engine produces 13 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V90 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1526 litres | no data | |
| Volvo V90 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar XF has
| |