Volvo V90 1997 vs Volvo 960 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 3.0 | 2.5 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 170 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 233 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 9.4 seconds | 9.3 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 10.6 - 11.1 | |
|
Volvo V90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo 960. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 and Volvo 960 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1702 litres | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo 960. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`100 kg | ~ 2`060 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`700 kg | ~ 1`600 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 400 kg | ~ 460 kg | |
| Volvo V90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Volvo 960. Therefore, Volvo 960 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |