Volvo V90 1997 vs SAAB 9-5 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo V90 is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 9-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 150 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 9.4 seconds | 7.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 9.3 - 11.4 | |
|
Volvo V90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
| Volvo V90 is 5 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.1 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`100 | ~ 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |