Volvo V90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V90
1997 - 1998
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.9 - 3.0 (petrol)2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Opel Omega is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 180 - 204 HP100 - 211 HP
Torque: 260 - 267 NM175 - 270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 9.4 seconds9.3 - 16.5 seconds
In general, Volvo V90 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Opel Omega. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.0 - 11.77.2 - 12.1
Volvo V90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.82 m
Width: 1.75 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Volvo V90 is 4 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 992 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1702 litres1800 litres
Volvo V90 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`100 kg~ 2`201 kg
Net weight:~ 1`700 kg~ 1`603 kg
Load capacity:~ 400 kg~ 598 kg
Volvo V90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem less than Opel Omega. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 26001200
Pros and Cons: Volvo V90 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv