Volvo V90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.9 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 100 - 310 HP | |
Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 203 - 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 9.4 seconds | 7 - 16 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 6.7 - 14.0 | |
Volvo V90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
Volvo V90 is smaller. Volvo V90 is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 1800 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo V90 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The Opel Omega may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`100 | ~ 2`274 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |