Volvo V90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V90
1997 - 1998
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.9 - 3.0 (petrol)2.0 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 180 - 204 HP100 - 310 HP
Torque: 260 - 267 NM203 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 9.4 seconds7 - 16 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.0 - 11.76.7 - 14.0
Volvo V90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.90 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Volvo V90 is smaller.
Volvo V90 is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 992 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1800 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo V90 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The Opel Omega may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`100~ 2`274
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 22001200
Pros and Cons: Volvo V90 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv