Volvo V90 1997 vs Citroen Xantia 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V90
1997 - 1998
Citroen Xantia
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Volvo V90 is available with rear wheel drive, while Citroen Xantia can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.9 - 3.0 (petrol)1.8 - 2.1 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 180 - 204 HP75 - 150 HP
Torque: 260 - 267 NM135 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 9.4 seconds10.8 - 18 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.0 - 11.75.7 - 10.3
Volvo V90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.71 m
Width: 1.75 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Volvo V90 is 15 cm longer than the Citroen Xantia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 992 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`100~ 1`450
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 22001000
Pros and Cons: Volvo V90 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
Citroen Xantia has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv