Volvo V90 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 320 HP | 120 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 480 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 10.2 seconds | 5.7 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.0 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 7.1 | |
|
Volvo V90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, a Volvo V90 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V90 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1526 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V90 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Volvo V90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`376 | ~ 2`187 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |