Volvo V90 Cross Country 2020 vs Ford EcoSport 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo V90 Cross Country is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford EcoSport can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford EcoSport also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 299 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 480 NM | 140 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 8.8 seconds | 11.5 - 14.1 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo V90 Cross Country are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford EcoSport. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.0 | 4.4 - 8.3 | |
|
Volvo V90 Cross Country petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford EcoSport. On average, Volvo V90 Cross Country equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 201 - 210 mm (7.9 - 8.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 Cross Country can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volvo V90 Cross Country is larger, but lower. Volvo V90 Cross Country is 72 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V90 Cross Country is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1526 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Volvo V90 Cross Country has more luggage capacity. Volvo V90 Cross Country has 227 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V90 Cross Country (by 288 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 Cross Country is 1.4 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport, which means Volvo V90 Cross Country can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`480 kg | ~ 1`732 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`882 kg | ~ 1`353 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 598 kg | ~ 379 kg | |
| Volvo V90 Cross Country load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem more than Ford EcoSport. Therefore, Volvo V90 Cross Country is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 Cross Country has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |