Volvo V60 2010 vs Seat Exeo 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V60 engine produces 20 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Seat Exeo. Thanks to more power Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V60 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V60 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V60 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1160 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo V60 is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Exeo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1241 litres | 1354 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo, which means Volvo V60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`582 kg | 1`490 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 508 kg | 560 kg | |
| Volvo V60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Seat Exeo. Therefore, Seat Exeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |