Volvo V60 2010 vs Seat Exeo 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V60 engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Exeo, but torque is 100 NM more than Seat Exeo. Due to the lower power, Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V60 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that by driving the Volvo V60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V60 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo V60 is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Exeo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 442 litres | |
| Volvo V60 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |