Volvo V60 2013 vs Toyota Auris 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V60 engine produces 174 HP more power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 240 NM more than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.1 | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V60 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V60 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time.
In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine Toyota Auris 2015 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Auris 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volvo V60 is larger. Volvo V60 is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V60 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. This could mean that the Volvo V60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |