Volvo V60 2013 vs Peugeot 308 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V60 engine produces 176 HP more power than Peugeot 308, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Peugeot 308. Thanks to more power Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 308 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V60 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 308, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V60 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Volvo V60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 308 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time.
In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine Peugeot 308 2017 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Peugeot 308 2017 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo V60 is larger. Volvo V60 is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 308, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1660 litres | |
|
Peugeot 308 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V60 has 180 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 308. This could mean that the Volvo V60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Peugeot 308, which means Volvo V60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volvo V60 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 308, so Volvo V60 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Peugeot 308 has
| |