Volvo V60 2013 vs Seat Exeo 2012

 
Volvo V60
2013 - 2018
Seat Exeo
2012 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP170 HP
Torque: 400 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds8.6 seconds
Seat Exeo is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo V60 engine produces 7 HP less power than Seat Exeo, but torque is 50 NM more than Seat Exeo. Due to the lower power, Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.4
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo V60 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that by driving the Volvo V60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1380 km in combined cycle1290 km in combined cycle
1580 km on highway1590 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.67 m
Width: 1.87 m1.77 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Volvo V60 is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Exeo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres442 litres
Volvo V60 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Seat Exeo.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2002`075
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 14 0006200
Pros and Cons: Volvo V60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Seat Exeo has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv