Volvo V60 2013 vs Kia Ceed 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V60 engine produces 48 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V60 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V60 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V60 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1580 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo V60 is larger. Volvo V60 is 3 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1694 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo V60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Volvo V60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`200 kg | 1`920 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`731 kg | 1`350 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 469 kg | 570 kg | |
| Volvo V60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Kia Ceed. Therefore, Kia Ceed is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V60, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |