Volvo V60 2013 vs Volvo V60 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V60 2013 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V60 2010, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo V60 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V60 2013 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60 2010, which means that by driving the Volvo V60 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V60 2013 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V60 2013 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Volvo V60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V60 2013 and Volvo V60 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1241 litres | 1241 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`110 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`662 kg | 1`589 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 448 kg | 511 kg | |
| Volvo V60 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Volvo V60 2010. Therefore, Volvo V60 2010 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |