Volvo V60 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 304 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 440 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.7 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 10.2 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Volvo V60 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Volvo V60 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 - 136 mm (4.9 - 5.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volvo V60 is smaller. Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1241 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Volvo V60 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`133 kg | ~ 2`490 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`592 kg | ~ 1`789 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 541 kg | ~ 701 kg | |
| Volvo V60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |