Volvo V60 2010 vs Volvo V50 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 304 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 440 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.7 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 10.2 | 5.0 - 10.1 | |
|
Volvo V60 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Volvo V60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volvo V60 is larger. Volvo V60 is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 417 litres | |
| Volvo V60 has 13 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Volvo V60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`129 | ~ 1`943 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |