Volvo V50 2004 vs Fiat Stilo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V50 engine produces 14 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, but torque is 20 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Volvo V50 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V50 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Volvo V50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V50 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
| Volvo V50 is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V50 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1307 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Stilo has more luggage space. Volvo V50 has 93 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V50 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V50 has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |