Volvo V50 2004 vs Chevrolet Nubira 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Volvo V50 engine produces 14 HP more power than Chevrolet Nubira, whereas torque is 179 NM more than Chevrolet Nubira. Despite the higher power, Volvo V50 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V50 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira, which means that by driving the Volvo V50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V50 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo V50 is larger. Volvo V50 is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Nubira, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V50 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1307 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V50 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`193 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V50 has
|
Chevrolet Nubira has
| |