Volvo V50 2004 vs BMW 3 series 2005

 
Volvo V50
2004 - 2007
BMW 3 series
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP163 HP
Torque: 340 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds8.6 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo V50 engine produces 27 HP less power than BMW 3 series, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo V50 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.5 l/100km
By specification Volvo V50 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Volvo V50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V50 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1320 km on highway
850 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.52 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Volvo V50 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volvo V50 is 1 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V50 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 417 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1307 litres1385 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Volvo V50 has 43 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 78 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V50 is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Volvo V50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8502`045
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
BMW 3 series has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V50, so BMW 3 series quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 22004000
Rating in user reviews: 6.4/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo V50 has
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv