Volvo V50 2004 vs BMW 3 series 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Volvo V50 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V50 engine produces 21 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 75 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Volvo V50 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo V50 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Volvo V50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo V50 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.41 m | |
Volvo V50 is larger. Volvo V50 is 3 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V50 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 435 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1307 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Volvo V50 has 18 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. This could mean that the Volvo V50 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V50 is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Volvo V50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V50 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |