Volvo V50 2004 vs Skoda Octavia 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 220 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 350 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | 7.5 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 10.2 | 5.1 - 8.3 | |
Volvo V50 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, Volvo V50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V50 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V50 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1307 litres | 1630 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Volvo V50 has 163 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 323 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V50 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Volvo V50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`856 | ~ 1`998 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V50 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |