Volvo V40 Cross Country 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 Cross Country engine produces 36 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 Cross Country reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volvo V40 Cross Country is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 Cross Country consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 Cross Country over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V40 Cross Country gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is larger, but lower. Volvo V40 Cross Country is 1 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 342 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota C-HR has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V40 Cross Country has 35 litres less trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. This could mean that the Volvo V40 Cross Country uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |