Volvo V40 Cross Country 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 Cross Country engine produces 36 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 Cross Country reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volvo V40 Cross Country is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 Cross Country consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 Cross Country over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V40 Cross Country gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is larger, but lower. Volvo V40 Cross Country is 1 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 342 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1500 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota C-HR has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo V40 Cross Country uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`975 kg | 1`865 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`498 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 477 kg | 475 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |