Volvo V40 Cross Country 2016 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 Cross Country engine produces 95 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 Cross Country reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.1 | |
| Volvo V40 Cross Country consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 Cross Country could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda 6 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo V40 Cross Country is 50 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 342 litres | 483 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Volvo V40 Cross Country has 141 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo V40 Cross Country can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`055 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |