Volvo V40 Cross Country 2016 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Volvo V40 Cross Country
2016 -
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds9.1 seconds
Volvo V40 Cross Country and Mazda 6 have the same engine power, but Volvo V40 Cross Country torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 6. Volvo V40 Cross Country reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.93.9
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1580 km in combined cycle1580 km in combined cycle
1720 km on highway1820 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.87 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Volvo V40 Cross Country is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volvo V40 Cross Country is 50 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 342 litres489 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Volvo V40 Cross Country has 147 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo V40 Cross Country can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`980no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data6600
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 Cross Country has
  • more dynamic
Mazda 6 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv