Volvo V40 Cross Country 2013 vs BMW X1 2009
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Volvo V40 Cross Country and BMW X1 have the same engine power, but Volvo V40 Cross Country torque is 50 NM more than BMW X1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volvo V40 Cross Country is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 Cross Country consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 Cross Country over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 Cross Country gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V40 Cross Country engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.55 m | |
| Volvo V40 Cross Country is 8 cm shorter than the BMW X1, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Volvo V40 Cross Country has 85 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Volvo V40 Cross Country can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
|
BMW X1 has
| |