Volvo V40 Cross Country 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 254 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 400 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 12.1 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.3 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Volvo V40 Cross Country equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is smaller. Volvo V40 Cross Country is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo V40 Cross Country can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`996 kg | ~ 2`499 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`550 kg | ~ 1`814 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 446 kg | ~ 685 kg | |
| Volvo V40 Cross Country load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 54 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |