Volvo V40 Cross Country 2016 vs Mazda 6 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo V40 Cross Country
2016 -
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Volvo V40 Cross Country is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.5 - 2.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 245 HP150 - 192 HP
Torque: 250 - 400 NM210 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 - 10.6 seconds7.8 - 10.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.7 - 6.43.9 - 6.3
On average, the Volvo V40 Cross Country petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 6. On average, Volvo V40 Cross Country equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.87 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Volvo V40 Cross Country is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volvo V40 Cross Country is 50 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 342 litres489 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Volvo V40 Cross Country has 147 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo V40 Cross Country can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`995no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data6600
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 Cross Country has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Mazda 6 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv