Volvo V40 Cross Country 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 Cross Country is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 245 HP | 116 - 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 400 NM | 142 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 10.6 seconds | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 6.4 | 3.9 - 6.9 | |
|
On average, the Volvo V40 Cross Country petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Toyota C-HR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is larger, but lower. Volvo V40 Cross Country is 1 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 342 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota C-HR has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V40 Cross Country has 35 litres less trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. This could mean that the Volvo V40 Cross Country uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 1`898 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |