Volvo V40 Cross Country 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 245 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 400 NM | 165 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 10.6 seconds | 8.9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 6.4 | 3.8 - 5.8 | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Volvo V40 Cross Country equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | 180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is smaller. Volvo V40 Cross Country is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V40 Cross Country is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 342 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1598 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Volvo V40 Cross Country has 88 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 Cross Country is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 1`953 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |