Volvo S90 2020 vs Mazda 6 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 100 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 438 litres | |
|
Volvo S90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S90 has 23 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 38 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |