Volvo S90 2020 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 56 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`095 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 35 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |