Volvo S90 2020 vs Mercedes E class 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 66 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mercedes E klase 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes E klase 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 79 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |