Volvo S90 2020 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S90 engine produces 34 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 481 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`182 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 35 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 6 has
| |