Volvo S90 2020 vs BMW 5 series 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Volvo S90 and BMW 5 series have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Volvo S90 2020 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| BMW 5 sērija 2016 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 3 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 530 litres | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 69 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 12.05 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 237.95 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 38 800 | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |