Volvo S90 2020 vs Jaguar XF 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
Volvo S90 engine produces 10 HP more power than Jaguar XF, but torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar XF. Despite the higher power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
Volvo S90 is 2 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 540 litres | |
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 79 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 38 800 | 21 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |