Volvo S90 2020 vs Mazda 6 2018

 
Volvo S90
2020 - 2020
Mazda 6
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 235 HP165 HP
Torque: 480 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 seconds10 seconds
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S90 engine produces 70 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.24.4
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S90 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 420 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 156 mm (6.1 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.90 m
Width: 1.88 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 461 litres481 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight: no data2`005 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 35 00021 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo S90 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv