Volvo S90 2020 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Volvo S90) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Skoda Superb), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 303 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 113 HP more power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.7 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.40 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 3520 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo S90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1760 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`590 kg | 2`295 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`019 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 571 kg | 705 kg | |
| Volvo S90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |