Volvo S90 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.96 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.71 m | |
Volvo S90 is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 27 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
Volvo S90 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.3 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 21 800 | 14 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |