Volvo S90 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S90 engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volvo S90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo S90 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but lower. Volvo S90 is 33 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Volvo S90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S90 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |