Volvo S90 2016 vs Mazda 6 2018

 
Volvo S90
2016 - 2018
Mazda 6
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP165 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10 seconds
Volvo S90 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 6. Despite less power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.4
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
1370 km on highway1550 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 152 mm (6 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.96 m4.90 m
Width: 1.88 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres481 litres
Volvo S90 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`005
Safety:
Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 25 60024 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo S90 has
  • better safety assist technologies
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv