Volvo S90 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S90 and Skoda Superb have the same engine power, but Volvo S90 torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Superb. Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 625 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |