Volvo S90 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 54 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Volvo S90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.71 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Volvo S90 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |