Volvo S90 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo S90 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Volvo S90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo S90 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1490 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 625 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |