Volvo S90 2016 vs Mazda 6 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.4 | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.96 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 481 litres | |
Volvo S90 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`005 | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 25 000 | 24 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |