Volvo S90 2016 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Volvo S90 and Volvo V90 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Volvo S90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo V90, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1526 litres | |
|
Volvo V90 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |