Volvo S90 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S90 engine produces 30 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.1 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 625 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |