Volvo S90 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
| Volvo S90 engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.1 | |
| Volvo S90 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 625 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`215 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |