Volvo S90 1997 vs Volvo 960 1994
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 267 NM | 267 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Volvo S90 and Volvo 960 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 11.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 12.0 l/100km | |
The Volvo S90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo S90 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 and Volvo 960 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo 960. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`960 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 960 has
| |